Bar­na­bás Vaj­da: The Issue of Fore­ign Hun­ga­ri­an Cul­tu­re Insti­tu­ti­ons in the Cor­re­spon­dence of Kunó Kle­bel­sberg

In his pres­ent study, Bar­na­bás Vaj­da is focu­sing on some par­ti­cu­lar issu­es of Hun­ga­ri­an cul­tu­ral insti­tu­ti­ons set up abro­ad by Count Kunó Klebelsberg, Min­is­ter of Cul­tu­re and Edu­ca­ti­on of Hun­ga­ry bet­we­en 1922-1931. Vajda’s work is based on the revi­si­on of let­ters and drafts that are part of Kle­bel­sberg’s writ­ten inher­i­tance kept at Nati­o­nal Szé­ché­nyi Library, Bu­da­pest.
Kle­bel­sberg (1875–1932), a con­ser­va­tive Hun­ga­ri­an poli­ti­ci­an and min­is­ter in Ist­ván Bet­hlen’s gover­nment from 1922 to 1931, is today con­si­de­red as a sig­ni­fi­cant poli­cy maker, main­ly due to his prog­re­ssi­ve reforms in pub­lic edu­ca­ti­on and uni­ver­si­ty research. In the sec­ond half of his nine-year-long ministership, Kle­bel­sberg foun­ded three Col­le­gi­um Hun­ga­ri­cums in Vienna, Rome and Ber­lin, and scho­lar­ship cen­tres in Pa­ris, Lon­don, Gene­va and Warsaw. Based on Act 1927:XIII, estab­lis­hed insti­tu­ti­ons were pro­po­sed to con­sist of rese­arch centres, art institutions, and under­gra­du­a­te coll­eges. A sup­por­ti­ve scho­lar­ship sys­tem was also created. The first Coll­ege was ope­ned in Vien­na (Sept. 1924), never­the­less the stra­te­gi­cal­ly most impor­tant one was in Ber­lin. From he­re Hun­ga­ry could reach not only Ger­ma­ny but also Scan­di­na­via and, rat­her surprisingly, some small Finno-Ugric nations, lin­gu­is­ti­cal­ly rela­ted to Hun­ga­ri­ans but living iso­la­ted in the Sovi­et Union. From the cor­re­spon­dence it is obvi­ous that Kle­bel­sber had two ma­jor hel­pers in Ber­lin: Carl Hei­nrich Bec­ker as Min­is­ter of Cul­tu­re of Prus­sia and Ró­bert Gragger, Kle­bel­sberg’s con­fi­dent sub­or­di­na­te as head of the Ber­lin institution.
There can be two ma­jor moti­va­ti­ons found behind Kle­bel­sberg’s actions. First, he atta­ched excep­ti­o­nal impor­tan­ce to the goal that rem­nants of Hun­ga­ri­an cul­tu­re and science, after the disas­trous­ly lost Word War I, would be able to com­pe­te with or at least not left behind too much by the most pres­ti­gi­ous cul­tu­res of Europe. The loca­ti­ons of the Coll­eges clearly show the li­mi­ted possi­bi­li­ti­es of Hun­ga­ri­an cul­tu­ral poli­cy in par­ti­cu­lar as well as of Hun­ga­ri­an fore­ign poli­cy in general, for Vienna, Rome, and Ber­lin were capi­tals of coun­tri­es from where Hun­ga­ry, as a coun­try for­ced into fier­ce inter­na­ti­o­nal iso­la­ti­on after 1918, could expect help with its revi­si­o­nist aims. With his slogan: „The Minis­try of Cul­tu­re is our Minis­try of Defence”, Kle­bel­sberg refer­red not only to the seve­re restric­ti­ons over the Hun­ga­ri­an Army after 1920, but also to his per­so­nal desi­re of a pea­ce­ful Hun­ga­ry com­pe­ting with other Euro­pe­an nati­ons in sci­en­ce and culture. Kle­bel­sberg’s sec­ond moti­va­ti­on for cre­a­ting Hun­ga­ri­an cul­tu­ral cen­tres abroad, was his pri­va­te con­vic­ti­on that any scho­lar­ship abroad, espe­ci­al­ly in the most deve­lo­ped countries, would high­ly encou­ra­ge young Hun­ga­ri­an researchers, main­ly those who keen on social sciences.
Some docu­ments show that Kle­bel­sberg as a min­is­ter had made attempts to back up Ita­li­an and Eng­lish cul­tu­re aga­inst the tra­di­ti­o­nal­ly strong Ger­man cul­tu­ral influ­en­ce over Hun­ga­ry. Some new appro­ach con­cer­ning Kle­bel­sberg’s atti­tu­de toward England can be com­pre­hen­ded from his cor­re­spon­dence with lord Rothermere, with whom the Min­is­ter had chan­ged let­ters regar­ding a plan of a boar­ding scho­ol on the Ti­hany Peninsula. The scho­ol was pro­po­sed to copy Eaton not only as to the sys­tem but also the lan­gu­a­ge of education.