Gá­bor Lel­kes: Region­al dis­par­i­ties in South­ern Slo­va­kia in rela­tion to the EU mem­ber­ship

The study deals with the devel­op­ment of the large scale region­al dis­par­i­ties in Slo­va­kia in rela­tion to the coun­try’s EU mem­ber­ship, focus­ing on South­ern Slo­va­ki­a, pop­u­lat­ed by the Hun­gar­i­an minor­i­ty. Before 2004 for al­most 8 decades this reg­ion had been han­dled as periph­er­al by the suc­ces­sive gov­ern­ments of Czecho­slo­va­kia and Slo­va­ki­a.

With the EU mem­ber­ship of the coun­try, a new area-struc­ture appeared, which shows the signs of a new eco­nom­ic and social area-struc­ture and also a trans­formed region­al set­tle­ment dis­tri­b­u­tion. Slo­va­kia’s entry to the Euro­pean Union is a huge, per­haps one in a life­time chal­lenge and oppor­tu­ni­ty for the inhab­i­tants of South­ern Slo­va­ki­a, which must be cap­i­tal­ized. How­ev­er, we can­not expec­t, that the EU mem­ber­ship auto­mat­i­cal­ly means eco­nom­ic and social rise for the reg­ion. The EU mem­ber­ship pro­vides only an oppor­tu­ni­ty to reduce the dif­fer­ences in the level of devel­op­ment of cer­tain region­s, an oppor­tu­ni­ty for a change of struc­ture and an oppor­tu­ni­ty to catch up. The actu­al eco­nom­ic and social rise itself depends on the regions them­selves, whether they live with the oppor­tu­ni­ty or not. Nat­u­ral­ly if we want to end South­ern Slo­va­kia’s periph­er­al char­ac­ter, we need a favourable cen­tral gov­ern­men­tal and region­al gov­ern­men­tal polit­i­cal atmos­phere (the peri­od between 2002 and 2006 is the best exam­ple for such cen­tral gov­ern­men­tal lev­el), since dur­ing the divi­sion of resources (EU or nation­al) and devel­op­men­tal invest­ments, the regions inhab­it­ed by Hun­gar­i­ans often fall vic­tim to the Slo­vak nation­al­is­tic polit­i­cal deci­sions (re­gions and town­ships inhab­it­ed by Slo­vak­s, which are already mo­re devel­ope­d, are the ma­jor ben­e­fi­cia­ries).
Two years after Slo­va­kia became a mem­ber of the EU, the in­de­xes of under­de­vel­op­ment and iso­la­tion in South­ern Slo­va­kia are still mo­re unfavourable, then the sim­i­lar in­de­xes in other regions – how­ev­er, there is a sig­nif­i­cant change in the process­es influ­enc­ing the ten­den­cies. The region­al dis­crep­an­cies in South­ern Slo­va­kia are caused by the struc­ture of the region­s’ econ­o­my (sec­tors pro­duc­ing lit­tle added value are dom­i­nan­t), by the lack of good qual­i­ty traf­fic infra­struc­ture and high­ly edu­cat­ed human resources, and by the restric­tive char­ac­ter of the Slovak-Hungarian rela­tion­s. There­fore the pol­i­cy of region­al devel­op­ment has to approach the prob­lem in it’s com­plex­i­ty in the fol­low­ing years, and the sup­port must come in a con­cen­trat­ed form, and it must be struc­tural­ly and region­al­ly tar­get­ed. The finan­cial back­ground of the eco­nom­i­cal-­so­cial rise of the regions inhab­it­ed by Hun­gar­i­ans may be based on their own resources, on the budg­et of the town­ship­s, the regions and of the coun­try, but most sig­nif­i­cant­ly on the resources of the EU. Draw­ing from the­se, how­ev­er requires active sys­tems of infor­ma­tion and train­ing/­con­sult­ing for those involved in the region­s. It is also nec­es­sary to tame the nation­al­is­tic feel­ings, which flared up on the Slo­vak and Hun­gar­i­an side in the sum­mer of 2006 and to restore the mutu­al trust between the major­i­ty nation and the Hun­gar­i­an minor­i­ty.