{"id":5067,"date":"2021-12-09T16:10:01","date_gmt":"2021-12-09T15:10:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/?p=5067"},"modified":"2021-12-09T16:10:01","modified_gmt":"2021-12-09T15:10:01","slug":"ollos-laszlo-european-identity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u0160amor\u00edn-Somorja, Forum Minority Research Institute, 2019, 240 p.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Does what we call Europe have a \u201csoul\u201d? Also, is there any fitting and legitimate heritage, any rational identity, where manifestations of backwardness and partnership, acceptance and compromise are in quest of their own completion amidst major temptations and compromises between nation-states\u2026? What has filled it? And, what is it that ought to be replaced in order to fill what we could consider a more complex condition of identity?<\/p>\n

L\u00e1szl\u00f3 \u00d6ll\u00f6s\u2019s European Identity is an attempt, as admitted by the author in his pre face to the book. Or, if one prefers to put it that way, he analyses the contradictions as well as the opportunities of the period(s) of the nation-state, and not just from any old perspective, but in the form of entities determined by the ways of functioning, ways which originate from the opportunities, the realizations and the contradictions of the organization of the state. However, the basis of his approach is not the assumption that this model of state organization should be defined by unfair fighting; instead, by a mutual process of importing and following each other\u2019s examples which regards joined forces rather than disagreement, as well as new goals of innovative solutions in the sphere of cultural heritage, as the determining factors. Yet, this cultural \u201cchoice range\u201d also requires that European nations contribute to the common cause from their own resources, considering the prospects of progress as part of their cultural heritage in a new era when what matters is yet another turn of progress in efficiency rather than the growth in size of one\u2019s own nation-state. Because what \u201cEurope\u2019s soul\u201d is, defining its opportunities, is the culture of that area, Europe; and its essential, \u201cnational cultural\u201d, contexts generate the cultural condition which is increasingly forming the perspectives of \u201crational heritage\u201d as feeling the lack of something, a symptom of crisis, enhancing or hindering the European Union\u2019s chances concerning decision-making, legitimacy, constitutionality and competitiveness. In sum, \u00d6ll\u00f6s \u201cattempts to put together the elements and methodological points which may promote the development of a new European identity, one upon which European civic society and political community can be constructed\u201d. That is, the \u201cPeople of Europe\u201d may be born.<\/p>\n

The author\u2019s venture is an enormous one. The eight chapters of the volume virtually cover the defining elements of key importance, including constitutional heritage, systems errors, national ideologies and conflicts, aggression, fear, ideological full speed, regio nal manifestations of a wish to show off, medieval tradition and political nation, common fate and legitimacy crisis, human life, progress, economic and political order, the brute force of the market, systems of values regarded as law, and issues of progress concerning political challenges. These are, on the one hand, the topics of separate chapters; on the other hand, the semantic elements, built upon each other, encourage a renewal in the direction of avoiding symptoms of crisis. The reason why this is necessary is that Europe itself stays behind in global competition while the refreshment of outdated administration and planning are becoming conditions for success or survival. If Europe fails in these aspects, \u201cits backwardness will continue, it will be overtaken by others in more and more areas, which will be accompanied by economic, political and wholesale social consequences. The book aims at avoiding another fault of the Enlightenment by not wishing to create people\u2019s image of Europe linked to a single stream of ideas, considering Europe to be a complex of a variety of values. That is why the conception must contain the values of political pluralism. Our work does not aim at obliterating the distinctions between individual political ideological trends; neither does it aim at relativizing their values. At the same time, however, it does not intend to call any one of them the sole repository of Europe\u2019s future, either. These views have been forming Europe\u2019s political history, and they will continue to form its future, too. We must avoid committing the mistake of Enlightenment whereby ideologies have mutually attempted one another from the circle of those which are deemed acceptable according to their values, co-operating only due to sheer necessity. At the same time, it is not sufficient to accommodate their compromises and their combinations within the boundaries of the new identity, but more of their differing basic values as well.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00d6ll\u00f6s considers the effect of Renais sance scepticism on our modern image of humanity to be the basis of improvement, but his fundamental suggestion is to create a complex identity which \u201cis rooted in today\u2019s world, yet its goal is to replace its internal weaknesses and contradictions by applying a number of new solutions and components.\u201d His project aims at connecting \u201cEuropeans, who have been greatly separated from each other in a cultural sense, mobilizing the creative spiritual capacity which has been latently present in their culture for centuries, and which can now be brought to life.\u201d In his plan he emphasizes the decrease of the population in the range of Europe\u2019s problems, since he considers \u201cregaining its leading position in global competition illusory\u201d, while that is the real potential for success, even through failures and crises. That is why the creation of complex forms of identity is needed, founded on the preservation of balance that we can see today in its disrupted version. In order for it to change, \u201cthe aim is to form a constitutional harmony which is simultaneously rooted in rational thought and sentiment, the will to modernize and the respect of tradition, European unity and national features. The concept also examines the cultural sources of European competitiveness, based on the characteristics of the new identity. The concept does not wish to transgress, abandon, or dissolve national identities; instead, its goal is to connect them, that is, it relies on them, furthering their development. And its aim is not merely to integrate the most respected elements of individual national cultures (elements which can be called rational): instead, it suggests that their emotional components be connected as well. Europeans need to be connected not merely via their ideological beliefs and calculated interests, but in their hearts, too. This is made possible for them, according to the book, by a new view on, and experience of, their cultural heritage.\u201d<\/p>\n

This train of thought in the Preface (in a somewhat shortened form in terms of content, too) rests on the professed concept, or should I say idea, that what is being discussed here is not a search for harmony within the hierarchy of primarily Europeans \u2013 secondarily nationally oriented ones, neither downright the other way round (primarily nationally oriented, secondarily European): \u201cone can be simultaneously a European and a member of their own nation\u201d (p. 15).<\/p>\n

It is obviously useful to remark that highlighting some (albeit crucial) conceptual key sentences of a volume of 240 pages, even though they may be the author\u2019s own summarizing ones, can hardly serve as a basis of a polemical essay. In order to do that, one would need to proceed chapter by chapter, formulating key sentences and critical arguments right on the spot. Lacking this, I can only rely on what the author\u2019s concept is constructed upon. In a word, a detailed overview of the components of identity.<\/p>\n

Now, I (from Budapest) do not claim that I am more familiar with this topic than \u00d6ll\u00f6s himself is with his own environmental-cultural minority identity. The book, composed \u201caround\u201d Europe and the diversity of identities, successfully fulfils its role. It describes, characterizes, identifies a critical basis, and constructs an innovative product of its contents from incidental and connected motifs. It elaborates, refines, compares, constructs, plans, counterpoints, overwrites, provides alternatives, and draws bold conclusions. And it is all done well. But, having read the book, it also turns out to lack a thick bibliography: the sources he relies upon are the same as his references (Giddens, Habermas, Wallerstein, Balibar, Jan Keller, Bernard Yack, etc.). Otherwise he builds a train of thought upon another or other ones, \u201crunning\u201d them sensitively, moving in circles, in accordance with the rules of classical European essay writing, as it were. It is, thus, an essay: bold, thought-provoking, stimulating. At the same time, his references as well as the quality and quantity of the literature of his choice (scarce but essential) indicate that he has indeed chosen a range of topics, almost archaic, by now (or, as yet) prophetic ones, too. However, he does not seem to be open to further distinctions other than his own.<\/p>\n

Let me give but one example. He says, \u201cInsofar as the immigrants adopt present-day Europe\u2019s concept of the family, they, too, will gradually disappear. Thus, further waves of immigration would become necessary. Meanwhile, of course, one would need to accept (based on historical evidence) that European culture in its current form is a culture of decline and extinction. Should others adopt it, they will also decrease in number. In order to accept this, even today\u2019s Europe must be able to offer something fundamental: the best way of life in the world; and, with it, an unshakeable force and power. If, however, Europe is unable to become a world leader, or, indeed, to stop its decline, no one will even consider that offer sincere. And, if the real choice is between the two ways of backwardness, with one of them resulting in the disappearance of national culture, it can be assumed that many, very many, will decide on returning to old national values\u201d (p. 196).<\/p>\n

Now, the assumption originating from the hypothesis might be pure and noble, but it might also be false. What immigrants, where, for what reason or purpose would (if they would) adopt the European concept of the family? Is there a \u201cEuropean\u201d (southern, eastern, northern, western?) concept of the family at all? And, should one include an African or a migrant Russian-Ukrainian-Turkish-Polish one, will that still count as (a different) concept of the family? Can it be unitary, or differing culture by culture, depending on the given minority? Also, why would they adopt it? In a desire to assimilate? Or, because it is fairer, or planned, or \u201cmore modern\u201d? Do we then regard Macedonians, Greeks, Poles, Lithuanians, Romungro1 Gypsies, or assimilated Jews as belonging to European culture? Could they be a part of the culture of extinction? And, if \u201cEurope must be able to offer something fundamental: the best way of life in the world\u2026\u201d \u2014 but it would be unable to offer it to all, would that mean the end of \u201cEuropeanness\u201d, something he assumes, by the way, to be there, to exist practically \u201cas an indivisible entity\u201d? Yet, interpretations throughout centuries and millennia have shown, too, that there is no indivisible entity; indeed, does Europe, as an idealized image of itself, not consist of a mixture of ideas, practice, heritage, inheritance, dying or refreshing interactions of other cultures?<\/p>\n

I would wish to wreathe \u00d6ll\u00f6s\u2019s words, his hypothesis and entire construction with my questions. But, should I claim that his essay-like approach with its well-shaped statements, mildly put questions, and the options aiming at an ideal would serve as an urge towards a better Europeanness, would my own approach, apparently a kind of disagreement, not be equally overgeneralizing with a spell of complexity? Or, worse still, downright anti-European reviling? Indeed, it is hard to ima gine anything better than what we have without ideals; but does this constructed version help Europe to define itself, or would it, instead, strengthen the hardly firm identity of today with further components? \u00d6ll\u00f6s appears to regard dividedness as surpassable; he seems to think that the creation of new images of humanity, following the Enlightenment, is a requirement, just as the controllability of modernization\u2019s machinery, or the entire complex system of mutual dependencies are required. He appears to deliberately contrast East with West, politics with tradition, backwardness with the interests of market development, modernization with the multi-polar world replacing the desired mono-polar world. While all of these are present in a mixed form at any one place, having a multi-national entity in a given \u201cnational\u201d culture, with their diversity being subordinated to a variety of dependency relations, \u00d6ll\u00f6s seems to conceptualize the way of surpassing Europe\u2019s dividedness by replacing the sinking concept of Europeanness with another, harmonizable, European identity of understanding and compromise, agreement and accordance\u2026 Yet, why should future harmony be stronger in character than it once was? Why should we expect humans to be more peaceful than what was possibly required in the past by their inherent solidarity? Or a state less nation-oriented, which would be required by Europe before painting the network of connections single-coloured, the network that has been shown to be divided and without hope by international politics and interests as well as for other reasons?<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the meantime, there appears the publicity campaign about being highly deve loped to conceal backwardness. This will probably be more significant in Western Europe than in the central parts of the continent, where the experience of the most highly deve loped area is an essential part of political and cultural tradition. It is against this that the factors causing backwardness must be concealed and made accepted. The ideological trends built upon the concept of modernization would be subject to a grave crisis of values. That is because the conditions advocated nowadays are those of gradual lagging behind. It is high time for the West, in its current position of neglect and disinterest, to thoroughly familiarize itself with what has traditionally been called Central-Europeanness, with the combination of repeated attempts to catch up as well as the subsequent falls, and the success or failure of learning and cultural adaptation\u201d (p. 234).<\/p>\n

Backwardness, and questions about development, interpreting them from \u201coutside and upside\u201d are by no means that recent. There existed no concept of Europe when \u201cgames of distinguishing ourselves from others\u201d divided what may have seemed unified as seen from Africa or the steppes of Russia. The \u201ccondition of gradual backwardness\u201d has been used as a tool by the current victorious power \u2014 anytime and anywhere, right against those living under the spell of \u201clagging behind\u201d. Moreover, even if we \u201cdemand\u201d, or expect, a more flexible attitude concerning the disinterest of the western part of Europe and the enforcement of the policy of openness, \u2014 whom would we favour then? Also, to get acquainted with \u201cCentral-Europeanness\u201d is not a task to be tackled by \u201cthe West\u201d, but by Central or Eastern European entities as well, to the same degree. Let us face the question, \u201cDo we actually know ourselves, or, each other?\u201d Then, which part of that is the \u201cWest\u201d supposed to come to know and respect? Furthermore, which \u201cWest\u201d? London, where the Polish immigrants could fill a major city? Or Paris, with its countyful of East European Gypsies? Or Madrid, with its provinceful of Romanian immigrants? Berlin, perhaps, with its former Jewish Quarter re-inhabited by Russian immigrants? Do all of these, then, constitute a mere interpretational piece of the puzzle called \u201cthe migration issue\u201d? Finally, what about Malta, where rich Russians outnumber locals \u2014 in that case, who must familiarize themselves with whom?<\/p>\n

\u00d6ll\u00f6s\u2019s book is an attempt, an experiment, to focus on a new form of identity, while our existing identities are being lost or transformed. This bit, just like the book in its entirety, is \u201cpart of a fundamental debate about the future of Europe, hoping to contribute to solving a range of issues concerning the current crisis\u201d (pp. 13\u201316), written the Preface to his book, outlining the whole volume. While he says nothing about whether debates about EU Identity are part of the new identity, one thing is undeniable: without debates, it would certainly be impossible for us to get that far \u2014 not<\/p>\n

128 Reviews<\/p>\n

even as far as practising the well-established principles of tolerance, partnership, acceptance and respect.<\/p>\n

My questions are, of course, fake ones. They present the wide range of multi-layered problematic issues raised by \u00d6ll\u00f6s\u2019s book \u2014 and by European identity. Despite this, since we are talking about identity, mutual idealizing, and never-ceasing interactions, this range of issues abound, and will continue to do so, in what could be called the seduction of answerability and the rationale of a new start. At least, we will \u2014 being loyal to new theories of ever newer enlightenments \u2014 have something to write about.<\/p>\n

Andr\u00e1s A.Gergely<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u0160amor\u00edn-Somorja, Forum Minority Research Institute, 2019, 240 p. Does what we call Europe have a \u201csoul\u201d? Also, is there any fitting and legitimate heritage, any rational identity, where manifestations of backwardness and partnership, acceptance and compromise are in quest of their own completion amidst major temptations and compromises between nation-states\u2026? What has filled it? And, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":604,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[555,844,540],"tags":[],"post_year":[744,838],"coauthors":[450],"class_list":["post-5067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-forum-social-science-review","category-reviews","category-szemle","post_year-744","post_year-2021-5"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity - F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity - F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u0160amor\u00edn-Somorja, Forum Minority Research Institute, 2019, 240 p. Does what we call Europe have a \u201csoul\u201d? Also, is there any fitting and legitimate heritage, any rational identity, where manifestations of backwardness and partnership, acceptance and compromise are in quest of their own completion amidst major temptations and compromises between nation-states\u2026? What has filled it? And, […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-12-09T15:10:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"A. Gergely Andr\u00e1s\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"A. Gergely Andr\u00e1s\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"A. Gergely Andr\u00e1s\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#\/schema\/person\/2cdf3ea77e2892771385a82aceeedcba\"},\"headline\":\"\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-09T15:10:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/\"},\"wordCount\":2747,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Forum Social Science Review\",\"Reviews\",\"Szemle\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/\",\"name\":\"\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity - F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-12-09T15:10:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Kezd\u0151lap\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/\",\"name\":\"F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle\",\"description\":\"Negyed\u00e9venk\u00e9nt megjelen\u0151 tu\u00addo\u00adm\u00e1\u00adnyos fo\u00adly\u00f3\u00adira\u00adt\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#organization\",\"name\":\"F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/szemle-logo.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/szemle-logo.svg\",\"width\":225,\"height\":53,\"caption\":\"F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#\/schema\/person\/2cdf3ea77e2892771385a82aceeedcba\",\"name\":\"A. Gergely Andr\u00e1s\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/author\/agergelyandras\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity - F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity - F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle","og_description":"\u0160amor\u00edn-Somorja, Forum Minority Research Institute, 2019, 240 p. Does what we call Europe have a \u201csoul\u201d? Also, is there any fitting and legitimate heritage, any rational identity, where manifestations of backwardness and partnership, acceptance and compromise are in quest of their own completion amidst major temptations and compromises between nation-states\u2026? What has filled it? And, […]","og_url":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/","og_site_name":"F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle","article_published_time":"2021-12-09T15:10:01+00:00","author":"A. Gergely Andr\u00e1s","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"A. Gergely Andr\u00e1s","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/"},"author":{"name":"A. Gergely Andr\u00e1s","@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#\/schema\/person\/2cdf3ea77e2892771385a82aceeedcba"},"headline":"\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity","datePublished":"2021-12-09T15:10:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/"},"wordCount":2747,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Forum Social Science Review","Reviews","Szemle"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/","url":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/","name":"\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity - F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-12-09T15:10:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/2021\/12\/09\/ollos-laszlo-european-identity\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Kezd\u0151lap","item":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"\u00d6ll\u00f6s, L\u00e1szl\u00f3: European Identity"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#website","url":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/","name":"F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle","description":"Negyed\u00e9venk\u00e9nt megjelen\u0151 tu\u00addo\u00adm\u00e1\u00adnyos fo\u00adly\u00f3\u00adira\u00adt","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#organization","name":"F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle","url":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/szemle-logo.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/szemle-logo.svg","width":225,"height":53,"caption":"F\u00f3rum T\u00e1rsadalomtudom\u00e1nyi Szemle"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/#\/schema\/person\/2cdf3ea77e2892771385a82aceeedcba","name":"A. Gergely Andr\u00e1s","url":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/author\/agergelyandras\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/604"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5067"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5067\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5068,"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5067\/revisions\/5068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5067"},{"taxonomy":"post_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_year?post=5067"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/forumszemle.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=5067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}