At­ti­la Si­mon: „There is a case” Sum­ma­ry on the State of His­to­ry Tea­ching at Hun­ga­ri­an Scho­ols in Slo­va­kia on the Basis of Ques­ti­on­na­i­re Sur­vey

It is a well-known fact that the state and qua­li­ty of nati­ve lan­gu­a­ge tea­ching is of deter­mi­ning impor­tan­ce from the aspect of the Hun­ga­ri­an mino­ri­ty’s pres­ent and futu­re in Slovakia. Not dea­ling with the prob­le­ms can be tra­ced back to the lack of long-term deve­lop­ment con­cep­ti­on of edu­ca­ti­on of Hun­ga­ri­ans living in Slovakia, of which draf­ting could be rea­li­sed only with the co-operation of pro­fes­si­o­nal orga­ni­sa­ti­ons and politics, as well. Although, the expe­ri­en­ce of the past show the lack of such discussions.
His­to­ry tea­ching at Hun­ga­ri­an scho­ols in Slo­va­kia bears all the ill­nes­ses of the domes­tic education. The cri­sis of his­to­ry tea­ching in Slo­va­kia (in Slo­vak and Hun­ga­ri­an language) start­ed befo­re the sys­tem changes. During the socia­lism this sub­ject was to beco­me the serv­ic­es of the system. The sys­tem chan­ges that took place in (Czecho)slovakia from 1989 put his­to­ry tea­ching to an enti­re­ly new situation. Rene­wal of his­to­ry tea­ching in Slo­va­kia from con­tex­tu­al point of view went rela­ti­ve­ly fast and smoothly. The coun­try’s in­te­rest on his­to­ry tea­ching remained, since the new poli­ti­cal lea­der­ship want­ed to use it for its own legi­ti­mi­za­ti­on again. Although, the ideo­lo­gi­cal con­tent was chan­ged to inter­na­ti­o­nal goals.
The study intro­du­ces the results of a sur­vey based on ques­ti­on­na­i­res exe­cu­ted in autumn of 2003. It sta­tes that his­to­ry tea­ching in Hun­ga­ri­an lan­gu­a­ge scho­ols in Slo­va­kia fights with seri­ous problems. Most of the respon­dents men­ti­o­ned as prob­lem the lack of sui­tab­le textbooks. This answer alter­na­ti­ve was mar­ked by mo­re than two-third of the respondents. The sec­ond most fre­qu­ent mar­ked prob­lem was the lack of qua­li­fi­ca­ti­on of his­to­ry tea­chers with Hun­ga­ri­an spi­rit that was mar­ked by mo­re than half of the respondents. Mo­re than half of the peda­go­gu­es mar­ked the lack of sui­tab­le tea­ching tools and qua­li­fi­ed pedagogues, the rest of the peda­go­gu­es thought that the cur­ri­cu­la were one of the rea­sons of the problems. From the given alter­na­ti­ves the less respon­dents answe­red the lack of a sui­tab­le fur­ther edu­ca­ti­on system.
Sum­ma­ri­zing the issue of tex­tbo­oks the most impor­tant seems to be the cre­a­ti­on of oppor­tu­ni­ti­es for choos­ing textbooks. It should be achi­e­ved that the peda­go­gue and the scho­ol through a peda­go­gi­cal prog­ram would choose the tex­tbo­oks to be used and of course that there would be an oppor­tu­ni­ty to choose. Besi­des the libe­ra­li­za­ti­on of the tex­tbo­ok mar­ket its pro­fes­si­o­nal con­trol is also very important, to enab­le our chil­dren to get to books that ref­lect the accept­ance and the valu­a­ti­on of tolerance, all kind of dif­fe­ren­ce (national, religious, etc.).
At our scho­ols teach his­to­ry peda­go­gu­es over and under forty years of age in the same extent. Although, our scho­ols are lac­king in qua­li­fi­ed young people. In the group of tea­chers youn­ger than 40 the rate of unqu­a­li­fi­ed peop­le is low. And this again stems from the low finan­ci­al and moral valu­a­ti­on of tea­chers – the unsol­ved prob­lem of tea­cher education. In Bra­ti­sla­va and Nitra mo­re than a dozen his­to­ry tea­chers accom­plish their studies. Although many of them does not work in this field.