LászÂló Öllös: The ConÂstiÂtuÂtion of the HunÂgarÂiÂan RepubÂlic and the HunÂgarÂiÂan MinoriÂties
The reÂfeÂrenÂdum on douÂble nationÂalÂiÂty even showed one of the sysÂtemÂatÂiÂcalÂly growÂing conÂflicts from the sysÂtem changes of the HunÂgarÂiÂan polÂiÂcy, nameÂly, that in conÂnecÂtion with the HunÂgarÂiÂans livÂing outÂside the terÂriÂtoÂry of HunÂgaÂry, there is no agreeÂment between the HunÂgarÂiÂan politÂiÂcal powÂerÂs. Despite that the deterÂminÂing direcÂtions of the sysÂtem changes were able to agree on the text of the conÂstiÂtuÂtion, the issue of the HunÂgarÂiÂan minoriÂties still resultÂed sysÂtemÂatÂiÂcalÂly appearÂing, strong presÂsures, unsolved conÂflicts in the HunÂgarÂiÂan politÂiÂcal life. With the examÂiÂnaÂtionÂs, mainÂly relyÂing on the prinÂciÂples of conÂstiÂtuÂtionÂalÂiÂty, the author wants to give reaÂson that since the issue, even if genÂerÂalÂly, is presÂent in the ConÂstiÂtuÂtion of the HunÂgarÂiÂan RepubÂlic, it results conÂstiÂtuÂtionÂal agreeÂment in the basic issues relatÂing HunÂgarÂiÂans outÂside the borÂderÂs. The author also examÂines the moral bases of conÂstiÂtuÂtionÂal agreeÂment that has been or can be evolved on the issue. LatÂer, arguÂing with the value sysÂtem of conÂstiÂtuÂtionÂal agreeÂmenÂt, he conÂfirms that from the text conÂstiÂtuÂtionÂal responÂsiÂbilÂiÂties arise. From the text itself, it is not eviÂdent that it is responÂsiÂble for the HunÂgarÂiÂan state and one of the group of the HunÂgarÂiÂan minoriÂties. The text of the conÂstiÂtuÂtion does not even clasÂsiÂfy HunÂgarÂiÂans livÂing outÂside the borÂderÂs, that is there is no word about HunÂgarÂiÂans of first, secÂond, or third class. ConÂseÂquentÂly, neiÂther the lack of responÂsiÂbilÂiÂty to the HunÂgarÂiÂans of the HunÂgarÂiÂan state canÂnot be origÂiÂnatÂed, neiÂther responÂsiÂbilÂiÂty to cerÂtain groups of minorÂiÂty HunÂgarÂiÂanÂs. ThereÂfore it is an insufÂfiÂcient standÂpoint to adjust the supÂport of minoriÂties to the recentÂly actuÂal HunÂgarÂiÂan power interÂestÂs.